I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
2026年1月，中央党校，省部级主要领导干部学习贯彻党的二十届四中全会精神专题研讨班开班。，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
:first-child]:h-full [&:first-child]:w-full [&:first-child]:mb-0 [&:first-child]:rounded-[inherit] h-full w-full。关于这个话题，爱思助手下载最新版本提供了深入分析
https://feedx.site
https://feedx.net